COP21 – war and peace

28.11.2015 - Rédaction France

This post is also available in: French

COP21 – war and peace

Par Ben Cramer.

An argu­ment can be made that COP21 must address the sub­ject of war and peace as an eco­log­i­cal issue.
Because secrecy veils the true num­bers, it is dif­fi­cult to accu­rately deter­mine the amount of atmos­pheric pol­lu­tion caused by the mil­i­tary. Nonethe­less, it is sig­nif­i­cant.
A cer­tain cor­re­la­tion can be found between the biggest C02 emit­ters of the world
and those who are in charge of the most mil­i­ta­rized com­plex.
How come the IPCC does not take into account this form of destruc­tive human activ­ity?
Let’s look at Air­craft emis­sions, for example.

To tackle the issue of mil­i­tary pol­lu­tion we need real, hard data. This means find­ing the right means, the right peo­ple, in the right place to work with us.
The video shows one exam­ple of the pol­lut­ing aspect from the impact of mil­i­tary con­flict. Burnt fields, exploita­tion and out­right theft of raw mate­ri­als diverted to mil­i­tary rather than peace­ful use, and the «dif­fer­en­ti­ated sta­tus» granted to cer­tain coun­tries under the Kyoto Pro­to­col are other exam­ples of pollution-​inducing mil­i­tary activ­i­ties that should be explored and dis­cussed.
US mil­i­tary oper­a­tions to pro­tect oil imports com­ing from the Mid­dle East are cre­at­ing larger amounts of green­house gas emis­sions than once thought, new research from the Uni­ver­sity of Nebraska-​Lincoln shows.

Green cli­mate fund

The mas­sive finan­cial resources allo­cated, absorbed or con­fis­cated by the mil­i­tary is another essen­tial issue to be addressed, but we have to be smart because the armed forces are posi­tion­ing them­selves as part of the solu­tion. And, whether we like it or not, they will have an influ­ence amongst the var­i­ous del­e­ga­tions. We must move beyond the pre­vi­ous idyl­lic con­cepts — that fund­ing for mis­siles and tanks should be diverted towards so-​called «devel­op­ment», for exam­ple. The «pol­luters pay» prin­ci­ple seems to have been for­got­ten. New pro­pos­als are needed, not only tax­a­tion of weapons trans­fers or even­tual taxes on nuclear war­heads but also other link­ages that would cre­ate spe­cific funds for dis­crete and com­pelling pur­poses. Money to aid and res­cue refugees, assist NGO’s work­ing on de-​pollution and decon­t­a­m­i­na­tion of mil­i­tary sites, fund­ing to help and defend whis­tle blow­ers. We have an oppor­tu­nity to high­light the huge gap between money spent by cer­tain big pow­ers on mil­i­tary assis­tance and that which is offered for cli­mate assis­tance.
The risks related to geo-​engineering could be a major focal point for us, par­tic­u­larly since the play­ers behind the pro­pos­als to «cli­ma­tise the planet» are often found to be linked in some way to the military-​industrial com­plex — many of whom have been the most vocal nuclear hawks. Focus­ing on geo-​engineering also gives us the oppor­tu­nity to point out that the 1978 ENMOD Con­ven­tion has been lying dor­mant for more than 20 years. The time is ripe to give ENMOD a new life, to reaf­firm the link­age between dis­ar­ma­ment and envi­ron­ment, and to enshrine Novem­ber 6 as a day of remem­brance with the same impor­tance as that of the first of May, June 5th or Sep­tem­ber 21. Activists from Iraq hope to address this issue at the Alter­na­tive Forum being held in Mon­treuil con­cur­rently with the main COP21 forum in le Bour­get and it’s our job to ensure the media makes this con­nec­tion. French activists should not for­get that France is the only NWS (and Israel) that has refused to sign the Con­ven­tion.
The main­stream Paris agenda will try to avoid these crit­i­cal issues, fram­ing the nuclear prob­lems as an energy «solu­tion» thus con­fus­ing the politi­cians and the pub­lic with degrees, ppm, and other fig­ures. Nev­er­the­less, there is a grow­ing num­ber of pub­lic fig­ures and jour­nal­ists who are seri­ous, ded­i­cated and ready to look at the hid­den side of IPCC and the incon­ve­nient truth sur­round­ing the Kyoto Pro­to­col. COP21 is the best oppor­tu­nity we have to raise these issues and it’s loca­tion itself pro­vides an impor­tant clue for them … the sim­ple fact the COP21 is tak­ing place at the pre­cise spot that hosts some of the world’s largest arms fairs (Eurosatory, Euron­aval, Milipol, Bour­get Air Show) should serve as a reminder and an inspi­ra­tion for all of us. COP21 might not be a peace con­fer­ence, but it would be a step in the right direc­tion if peo­ple real­ize that nego­ti­a­tions about Cli­mate Change share much in com­mon cause with those con­fer­ences that deal with Disarmament.

Email : b52cramer@gmail.com
Hash­tag in the mak­ing
#eco­log­i­calse­cu­rity

Categories: Opinions, Peace and Disarmament
Tags: , , ,

Newsletter

Enter your e-mail address to subscribe to our daily news service.

Search

Training Pressenza

Documentaries Catalogue

Every Sunday

Culture and Arts Notebook

In Mobilization For Assange!

In The Zone Podcast

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons

Archives

xpornplease pornjk porncuze porn800 porn600 tube300 tube100 watchfreepornsex

Except where otherwise note, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.