{"id":374525,"date":"2016-09-28T13:31:35","date_gmt":"2016-09-28T12:31:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/?p=374525"},"modified":"2016-09-29T04:37:51","modified_gmt":"2016-09-29T03:37:51","slug":"la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/","title":{"rendered":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale.<\/p>\n<p><strong>La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du harc\u00e8lement au travail. Retour en arri\u00e8re pour comprendre\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>L\u2019article L.1154\u20131 du code du travail, dans sa r\u00e9daction loi n\u00b0 2016\u20131088 du 8 ao\u00fbt 2016 (Loi travail), article 3, dispose : \u00ab\u00a0<em>lorsque survient un litige relatif \u00e0 l\u2019application des articles L.1152\u20131 \u00e0 L.1152\u20133 (Harc\u00e8lement moral) et L.1153\u20131 \u00e0 L.1153\u20134 (Harc\u00e8lement sexuel), le salari\u00e9\u00a0pr\u00e9sente des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de fait laissant supposer\u00a0l\u2019existence d\u2019un harc\u00e8lement\u00a0<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<p>Ce mode de preuve a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 critiqu\u00e9 par le conseil constitutionnel, en 2002, \u00e0 l\u2019occasion de la promulgation de la loi de modernisation sociale du 17 janvier 2002 qui disposait \u00ab\u00a0<em>le salari\u00e9 concern\u00e9\u00a0pr\u00e9sente\u00a0des \u00e9l\u00e9ments\u00a0de fait\u00a0laissant supposer\u00a0l\u2019existence d\u2019un harc\u00e8lement\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>\u00a0(code du travail, article L.122\u201352, r\u00e9daction loi n\u00b0 2002\u201373 du 17 janvier 2002, article 169, Jacques Chirac \u00e9tant pr\u00e9sident).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Le Conseil avait aussi critiqu\u00e9 ce mode de preuve par ses \u00ab\u00a0<em>r\u00e9serves d\u2019interpr\u00e9tation\u00a0\u00bb \u00e9non\u00e7ant\u00a0:\u00a0<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0<em>les r\u00e8gles de preuve plus favorables \u00e0 la\u00a0<\/em><em>partie demanderesse<\/em><em>\u00a0instaur\u00e9es par les dispositions critiqu\u00e9es (loi n\u00b0 2002\u201373 du 17 janvier 2002, article 158 et 169)\u00a0<\/em><em>ne sauraient dispenser<\/em><em>\u00a0celle-ci d<\/em><em>\u2018\u00e9tablir la mat\u00e9rialit\u00e9 des \u00e9l\u00e9ments<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><em>de fait pr\u00e9cis et concordants\u00a0<\/em><em>qu\u2019elle pr\u00e9sente au soutien de l\u2019all\u00e9gation selon laquelle la d\u00e9cision prise \u00e0 son [\u2026] proc\u00e9derait d\u2019un harc\u00e8lement moral ou sexuel au travail\u00a0; ainsi,\u00a0<\/em><em>la partie d\u00e9fenderesse<\/em><em>\u00a0sera mise en mesure de s\u2019expliquer sur les agissements qui lui sont reproch\u00e9s et de prouver que sa d\u00e9cision est motiv\u00e9e [\u2026]par des \u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs \u00e9trangers \u00e0 tout harc\u00e8lement<\/em>\u00bb. (Cons. constit. n\u00b0\u00a0<a href=\"tel:2001%E2%80%93455\">2001\u2013455<\/a>\u00a0DC\u00a0 du\u00a0<a href=\"x-apple-data-detectors:\/\/embedded-result\/1126\">12 janvier<\/a>2002\u00a0: JO du\u00a0<a href=\"x-apple-data-detectors:\/\/embedded-result\/1148\">18 janv.<\/a>, p. 1053\u00a0; c. trav. 2005, lexisnexis par Bernard Teyssi\u00e9, notes 1 &amp; 2 sous art. L.122-52).<\/p>\n<p>Un an plus tard, sous\u00a0 le gouvernement Raffarin, Fran\u00e7ois Fillon \u00e9tant ministre des Affaires sociales, est \u00e9dict\u00e9 un nouveau r\u00e9gime de la preuve, par la loi n\u00b0 2003\u20136\u00a0 du 3 janvier 2003, article 5, modifiant l\u2019article L.122\u201352 en ces termes : \u00ab\u00a0<em>en cas de litige relatif \u00e0 l\u2019application des articles L.122\u201346 (harc\u00e8lement sexuel) et L.122\u201349 (harc\u00e8lement moral), d\u00e8s lors que le salari\u00e9 concern\u00e9\u00a0\u00e9tablit des faits\u00a0qui permettent de\u00a0pr\u00e9sumer\u00a0l\u2019existence d\u2019un harc\u00e8lement<\/em>\u00bb, ce qui est bien \u00e9videmment plus exigeant que ne l\u2019\u00e9tait le texte de la loi de modernisation sociale, vot\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0<em>\u00e0 la va vite<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb avant l\u2019\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle d\u2019avril 2002 et r\u00e9primant le harc\u00e8lement moral pr\u00e8s de dix ans apr\u00e8s le harc\u00e8lement sexuel ! Promesse \u00e9lectorale oblige\u2026<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Retour en 2002<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On peut \u00eatre surpris de ce retour au mode probatoire \u201csimplifi\u00e9\u201d de 2002 par la loi El Khomri de 2016. N\u2019est-ce pas en \u00e9cho \u00e0 l\u2019appel et aux t\u00e9moignages de dix-sept anciennes ministres (Le Journal du Dimanche et \u00ab<a href=\"http:\/\/ lelab.europe1.fr\/harcelement-sexuel\"><em>http:\/\/\u00a0lelab.europe1.fr\/harcelement-sexuel<\/em><\/a>\u00bb du 15 mai 2016) qui d\u00e9noncent le harc\u00e8lement sexuel en politique, tandis que tout un chacun n\u2019ignore pas l\u2019attitude de certains, des plus \u00e9lev\u00e9s dans le domaine de la res publica, que cela se passe au FMI ou soit consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par un ministre, simplement comme \u00ab\u00a0<em>un<\/em><em>geste inappropri\u00e9<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb (Le Soir \u2013 11 mai 2016) !<\/p>\n<p>Etonnant, la loi El Khomri n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 soumise au Conseil constitutionnel sur la question du mode de preuve du harc\u00e8lement moral et sexuel. Ainsi, si par sa d\u00e9cision du 4 ao\u00fbt 2016, le Conseil\u00a0constitutionnel a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 inconstitutionnelles certaines dispositions de la loi, il a bien pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 ne s\u2019\u00eatre \u00ab<em>\u00a0pas prononc\u00e9 d\u2019office sur la conformit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Constitution des autres dispositions de la loi dont il n\u2019\u00e9tait pas saisi. Elles pourront, le cas<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00e9ch\u00e9ant, faire l\u2019objet de questions prioritaires de constitutionnalit\u00e9\u00a0<\/em>\u00bb (communiqu\u00e9 de presse du Conseil Constitutionnel du 4 ao\u00fbt 2016).<\/p>\n<p>Les d\u00e9fendeurs accus\u00e9s de harc\u00e8lement ne manqueront pas de d\u00e9poser une\u00a0<em>\u00ab question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9\u00a0<\/em>\u00bb, sur le r\u00e9gime de preuve des harc\u00e8lements d\u2019autant qu\u2019aux termes des articles 126\u20131 et suivants du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, la partie au proc\u00e8s qui estime n\u00e9cessaire de transmettre \u00e0 la Cour de cassation une question prioritaire de constitutionnalit\u00e9 peut le faire librement.<\/p>\n<p>Le droit n\u2019a pas donc pas dit son dernier mot\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Michel Pierchon, avocat et sp\u00e9cialiste en droit du travail et de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du harc\u00e8lement au travail. Retour en arri\u00e8re pour comprendre\u2026 L\u2019article L.1154\u20131 du code du travail, dans sa&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":752,"featured_media":374538,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[98,85,163,93],"tags":[18664,1034,31029,26287,31030],"class_list":["post-374525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-droits-de-lhomme","category-europe-fr","category-opinion-fr","category-politique","tag-code-du-travail","tag-france-fr","tag-harcelement-sexuel","tag-loi-el-khomri","tag-michel-pierchon"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pressenza\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PressenzaItalia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"250\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"R\u00e9daction Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@PressenzaIPA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PressenzaIPA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"R\u00e9daction Paris\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"R\u00e9daction Paris\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/44cfe99d66146fb98cd87c45093da9bf\"},\"headline\":\"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\"},\"wordCount\":746,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Code du travail\",\"France\",\"Harc\u00e8lement sexuel\",\"loi El Khomri\",\"Michel Pierchon\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Droits humains\",\"Europe\",\"Opinion\",\"Politique\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\",\"name\":\"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg\",\"width\":250,\"height\":200},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"Pressenza\",\"description\":\"International Press Agency\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Pressenza\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/pressenza_logo_200x200.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/pressenza_logo_200x200.jpg\",\"width\":200,\"height\":200,\"caption\":\"Pressenza\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PressenzaItalia\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/PressenzaIPA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/44cfe99d66146fb98cd87c45093da9bf\",\"name\":\"R\u00e9daction Paris\",\"description\":\"News published by the Pressenza bureau in Paris, France\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/author\/redaction-paris\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat","description":"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat","og_description":"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du","og_url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/","og_site_name":"Pressenza","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PressenzaItalia","article_published_time":"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":250,"height":200,"url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"R\u00e9daction Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@PressenzaIPA","twitter_site":"@PressenzaIPA","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"R\u00e9daction Paris","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/"},"author":{"name":"R\u00e9daction Paris","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/44cfe99d66146fb98cd87c45093da9bf"},"headline":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat","datePublished":"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/"},"wordCount":746,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg","keywords":["Code du travail","France","Harc\u00e8lement sexuel","loi El Khomri","Michel Pierchon"],"articleSection":["Droits humains","Europe","Opinion","Politique"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/","name":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg","datePublished":"2016-09-28T12:31:35+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-29T03:37:51+00:00","description":"Par :\u00a0Michel\u00a0Taube \u00a0Opinion Internationale. La disposition est pass\u00e9e inaper\u00e7ue mais la loi El Khomri revient au r\u00e9gime de 2002 pour \u00e9tablir la preuve du","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/558556907.jpg","width":250,"height":200},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/2016\/09\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"La preuve du harc\u00e8lement selon la loi El Khomri, l\u2019analyse de Michel Pierchon, avocat"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/","name":"Pressenza","description":"International Press Agency","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#organization","name":"Pressenza","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/pressenza_logo_200x200.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/pressenza_logo_200x200.jpg","width":200,"height":200,"caption":"Pressenza"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PressenzaItalia","https:\/\/x.com\/PressenzaIPA"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/#\/schema\/person\/44cfe99d66146fb98cd87c45093da9bf","name":"R\u00e9daction Paris","description":"News published by the Pressenza bureau in Paris, France","url":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/author\/redaction-paris\/"}]}},"place":"France","original_article_url":"https:\/\/www.opinion-internationale.com\/2016\/09\/28\/la-preuve-du-harcelement-selon-la-loi-el-khomri-lanalyse-de-michel-pierchon-avocat_46653.html","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/752"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374525\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/374538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pressenza.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}